The emphasis here is on “raw”. The key to successful writing a master’s thesis can be for students, namely, to understand the process of writing as an operation in which initially a raw mixture for later editing is created.
Be so much and the liberating feeling of temporariness of all your keystrokes! When you write to your thesis, then you create anything permanent, but simply material for later processing. Moreover, the more – and that can mean the coarser – you write, the more raw material for the thesis is available later disposal. Fast typing is important to trick the inner censor who often exerts an inhibitory influence on the development of your thesis. This censor you need until the time of the revision of the chapter of your thesis. Advised in writing not to brood over sentences that do not really want to succeed, therefore. Continue writing rather fast pace, even if you have concerns with your own wording.
Be aware that you need to revise a text, a chapter or subchapter of your thesis many times until you have written a good and (almost) final version. Revise a draft version only until you really have no more desire. Then do something else. You will anyway have to return to this version several times.
Scientific style of the thesis
In this revision phase of writing your thesis, you submit your formulations also to the stylistic demands of academic writing. Eliminate colloquial words and phrases, replace figurative language by explicit statements, prove analytical distance to your subject by write in a value-neutral language, and do not use words like “I” or “we.” In addition, you make the most important statements in main clauses rather than in subordinate clauses. When you write, put your own review in the proper light.
Another fine-tuning of the thesis
Allow yourself plenty of time for this final stage of writing your thesis, at least a few weeks. During this time, you should bring very little new source material.
Instead, you should revise each chapter of your thesis again to align all linguistic details in the finalized now objectives and arguments of the thesis.
An introduction must create a motivation to read! However, how this can be achieved? The introduction should make contact with the reader. This works if you manage to make contemporary perspectives and outline your problem in this context. In this way, you have already explained in the introduction your choice of subject. Here we will try to be helpful with some tips. Read them carefully and try to follow them because they can be of great help to you.
In your introduction, you should present the following points of your thesis:
a) Situation at the beginning of your thesis
In an introduction, include preliminary information on the subject of the topic (which will serve as an appetizer to stimulate and to learn more). It makes sense to give in the introduction an overview of the structure of your thesis – that the reader can follow you better. The introduction gives you the opportunity to explain how your question fits in with the current state of research, as and the things that you do not agree and why. Expose your thoughts clearly; let us not leave the impression of ambiguity.
In the introduction, you must narrow your topic (and this limitation justified) and specify your interest.
c) The goal of your thesis
Describe the goal of your research project. What do you want to have figured out at the end and why?
d) Method and approach to your topic
Your introduction sets out your method and approach, and the reasons for it.
Why it makes sense to settle with the introduction of the thesis effort
Note: You describe your project, the way you work and the current state of research.
Your introduction is therefore to be understood as an advertisement for your thesis and should provide incentive to keep reading. Your little “extra effort” that you have with your introduction sure will be reflected in the valuation your thesis.
An essay treats a scientific question in a concise and distinctive form (about 4-5 pages). The focus is on the critical examination of a topic. The main lines of argument should not come out of the eye. Therefore must be eliminated all non-essential details. Instead, the focus is a thesis that will be revisited in the context of an argumentative question.
The focus of the essay is to develop your own ideas and positions that goes beyond the mere reproduction of the texts used. The thoughts of other authors or writers should paraphrase generally, that are presented in their own words. Quotations (which must be labelled as such always) should be used only when absolutely necessary, of course, especially if one wants to criticize statements. The difference between their own and other texts must be clearly visible. The same applies to the difference between foreign and own reasoning.
It raise an interesting question and plausible answer (question, hypothesis and content).
An argumentative structure (outline)
Question, thesis content
An essay without own question, hypothesis and plausible reasoning is not an essay. Question and its reasoning must therefore be clear. Only when you know what angle you want to read texts and write an essay, you can distinguish between important and unimportant, theses and arguments can be examined critically.
This requires the underlying texts are read and processed accurately – only if they are covered conceptually and they are theoretically precise, can say that they are properly supported. What is special about the particular presentation of the theory / the facts / the arguments? Are they conclusive? What is the relation to reality or to present-day problems?
It should be in accordance with the context of read messages, media or personal experiences. Your own argument should ultimately be plausible and comprehensible. You should develop your own point of view and explain it.